Spring 2014 vacation, around home, day 3
This is the third batch of the photos that I shot around where I live. There will be more flowers than birds, including the tulips, finally. đŸ˜‰
All the images were taken with my newer 300 mm prime L series lens with a Tamron 1.4 X extender, and shot handheld. I’m not completely used to using a tripod yet, I still find it easier to shoot handheld, moving around slightly until I get the best light and composition that I can. I have trouble visualizing that as I’m setting up my tripod, what I may start doing is use the long lens to “see” the shot that I want, then set up my tripod and the Tokina macro lens to actually shoot the shot.
I did get a lifer, an Estes bird!
Here’s the series of tulip photos that I’m quite proud of, I think that I did a pretty good job with these.
This one’s not bad either.
I sat down on a bench in the shade to take a break, and it was only a few seconds before Bruiser, the male red-tailed hawk came by, as he was being mobbed by red-winged blackbirds. I still haven’t swapped all my dedicated settings between my two camera bodies, so I didn’t have my saved bird in flight set up to use, I had to adjust manually for these, which is why they are slightly overexposed. Sorry for so many of these, I probably should have deleted a few more, but that’s me.
Finally, my best photos of a six spotted tiger beetle. I have no idea how these came to be named what they are as I see no resemblance to a tiger at all, I don’t name them, I just photograph them. đŸ˜‰
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Spring 2014 vacation, around home, day 2
This is the second batch of the photos that I shot either around where I live, or the Pickerel Lake Nature Preserve last week while I was on vacation. I don’t think that too many words are needed for these, the captions should suffice.
I’ll start with one of my favorite species of birds, even though I’ve posted many images of them lately, a grey catbird in full song.
I’ll still be posting photos of birds all summer, for those people who were worried that they’d see no more bird photos here, but I hope that the ones I do post will be better than this next one.
Or this one, the only reason I’m including this is because it was a lifer for me, but it took off before I could shoot more than this poor image, so I’m not able to ID it.
This little chickadee was making sure that it got my attention so that I would photograph it. I did, as you can see, and I have more images of the chickadee, but in the poor light of that day, those aren’t worth posting.
A few of the other things that I saw, no words required.
I found two very young fawns, the photos are only fair, as I didn’t want to get too close to them, so I had to shoot through the grass.
Every spring, well-meaning people think that when they find fawns alone like this that their mother has either abandoned the fawns, or been killed. That isn’t the case, the fawns have no scent that predators can pick up to lead the predator to the fawns, and the fawns are so well hidden that it’s hard for anything to spot them. Trust me on the well hidden part, if the first one hadn’t stood up, I would have walked right on past them.
Anyway, the mother will leave the fawns where they are well hidden, then move a short distance away so that no predators following her scent will find the fawns. It’s nature’s way of protecting the helpless.
Many birds and animals use similar tactics to protect their young, with the adults leaving the young, which seems cruel. But by doing so, the adults make themselves the target of any predators, leaving the young to hide motionless and soundless in cover while any predators follow the adults.
A few more that need no help from me.
Here’s another example of a young animal that most people (or predators) would have missed, a young cottontail rabbit. If I hadn’t seen an ear twitch, I would have missed the bunny.
I didn’t get to the tulips, that’s OK, I’ll post those soon enough. I think that the photos from this post are the “weakest” of my week, other than the fawns.
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Spring 2014 vacation, around home
I didn’t stop shooting photos when I got back home for the time between when I was near Grayling, Michigan and when I went back up to Ossineke, Michigan. I walked my normal daily walk on a few days, went to Pickerel Lake one day, and Muskegon for two days, well, that includes the time after I returned from Ossineke, too.
It’s mid to late spring around here, a transitional time, and the photos that I post will reflect that. The spring bird migration is all but over with, and soon, there will be just the same old summer resident birds to photograph around here. However, there are new flowers and insects appearing daily, some lasting just a few days, some linger throughout the summer.
As spring gives way to summer, I’ll be posting fewer images of birds, and more images of flowers and insects. I’ve been going through the hundreds of photos that I have taken around here this past week and deleting a good many photos of birds, so hopefully, I won’t be boring every one with dozens of images of the same species of birds over and over. I can’t say that I won’t do that with flowers now. đŸ˜‰
It’s a great time to be living in southern Michigan right now, the lilacs, honeysuckle, and some members of the viburnum family are in bloom, filling the air with their wonderful fragrances! Soon, they will give way to wild roses, and other equally fragrant blooms.
I’ve been trying to use the Tokina 100 mm macro lens more often, but I’ve been thwarted by the wind on most days. We’ve had swings in the high temperatures of almost 40 degrees up and down over the past two weeks, and the only way that air masses can change that quickly is with stiff winds moving them in and out. The forecast is for a week of fairly stable weather for the next week, so maybe I get more chances to use that lens. The 300 mm prime lens does a superb job on flowers, but I often have to crop more than I would like to get the desired results. And, because I have to be five feet from my subject, it limits how I can compose my photos.
I suppose I should do a few housekeeping chores here. I have enough photos for three posts from around home, and two from the days that I went to Muskegon. I also have 280 images that I shot while in the Ossineke area, but that number will be cut down dramatically as I go through them more. There’s a lot of bad shots of eagles and sunsets in that number, along with multiple images of the same species of birds, especially the Lifers that I saw, along with the better photos for posts that I’ve already done in the My Photo Life List project.
And speaking of that, I’ve had a fairly good spring as far as adding to the number of saved photos for use in future posts in that series. I’m closing in on 200 species of birds, and with any luck, I’ll go over 200 by the time that the next winter arrives. I did two posts a week in that series while I was on vacation, I may skip this week, then go back to one a week from then on.
I’ll still have to photograph birds, especially the smaller ones, as it takes practice to find them in the brush, and time when to press the shutter release. I think that this series of photos that I wouldn’t normally post if I had gotten a good one will show. That means the that the images in this post will be out of order, but so be it.
I’d like to promise that those are the last bad photos that you’ll see here, but I won’t make promises that I know that I can’t keep. đŸ˜‰
There should be plenty of other subjects to shoot, and plenty of days with sunny weather, so that I won’t have to try to photograph birds in low light unless I see something special from now on.
Although, there are a few photos that I shot while it was raining on day that I would like to share, as just like trying to catch small birds on the move, one has to stay in practice shooting in poor conditions.
Okay, I’ve said before that I want to move towards quality over quantity, and I’ve been trying to do that. I now have a great deal of confidence in my photo equipment, enough to know that I can pull off almost any shot if I have to. But, there’s another change taking place as well, my confidence as a birder is growing as well.
I’ve only been serious about identifying birds for a little over two years now, some of the species are very hard to ID. I’ve now seen my name attached to several rare bird alerts from eBird, which for some reason, has helped me gain confidence. It turns out that birds that I thought were rare are really quite commonplace, and every time that I see one, it gets easier to ID them. And, it isn’t just by how they look, it’s also how they act, and their songs, which makes the entire process of picking which birds to try to photograph even easier as I go along.
Over the last two years, I’ve learned where to go and when, and I’ve also learned that given how much time I spend outdoors, I am going to get the birds eventually. These last two weeks has been a huge leap for me as far as birding as well. I was able to get very good photos of two northern parulas in just 4 days, and they are supposed to be tough to get. Here’s one from on my trip.
But, I don’t want to go off on a tangent right now, so back to the photos from around home.
With a couple of images of flowers, it seems like a good time to throw in the few that I shot with the Tokina macro lens.
And now, a few flowers shot with the 300 mm prime lens.
If only everyday could be like this one in the next photo was!
The last two were taken with the 15-85 mm lens, and I still would like an even wider lens. That hit home while I was shooting landscapes up north. I know that I said that I wanted a Sigma 10 to whatever it was lens, and I may still end up with one. However, Canon has just introduced a EF S 10-16 mm lens at a reasonable price, around $300. But, wasn’t available yet the last time I was at the camera store. I’m in no hurry, I’ll wait for the reviews to come out, then see what the true cost will be. I know that the lens hood is extra, so the Canon lens may not be that much cheaper than the Sigma I had been looking at. But, that’s another post, someday down the road. Back to the photos.
A few of birds all fluffed up to ward off the cold last week.
I know that I just inserted a catbird image, and that the next one is blurry, that’s because a catbird had picked up a leaf and was waving it around wildly, the second time that I have seen them do that.
I don’t know if leaf waving is part of their courtship display, of if they do that to prevent us from getting a good photo. đŸ˜‰ But, the one in the photo above paused to take a look around after the leaf waving.
No matter what the reason, this red squirrel that was watching me watching the catbird, thought the entire thing was quite funny, especially since he was partially hidden from me as well.
Well, I think that I’ve gone on long enough for this one.
I have plenty more photos to go, and most of them were taken on much nicer days than what the photos in this post were, including some images of tulips that I am quite proud of.
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Another quick update
I’m back again, it was another four great days up north, this time I stayed at the Ossineke State Forest Campground where I had stayed last Memorial Day weekend. I was really torn about coming home a day or two early, but I’ve wanted this vacation to be all about relaxing. By coming home a little early, I avoid the traffic of the holiday weekend, and it gives me time to unpack, clean, and put my camping gear away. Besides, I’ve found that four 16 to 18 hour days of chasing birds wears me out even if I eat better. đŸ˜‰
Overall the weather was fair, although very windy for the first two days, with a mixture of complete overcast to totally sunny times for much of my time up there.
I got a lifer, a northern parula, if you see all of the  so-so photos of it that I took, it will look like a northern parula.
And, I was able to get photos of a species that I had seen before, but never photographed, Caspian Terns.
Not bad, an hour after I arrived, I had photos of one of the terns and you can even see its tongue, I’m getting good at that. đŸ˜‰
Mostly, I was able to get better photos of birds that I’ve already done posts on in the My Photo Life List project that I’m working on.
Okay, I’m going to go into some detail concerning camera gear, so you may want to skip this part.
As you may know, I recently purchased a 300 mm prime L series lens. When the auto-focus is dead on, the lens is astounding as far as the results that I get. However, it is seldom dead on.
After talking to the Canon rep last weekend, I’ve been using the rear button auto-focus most of the time, even though that ties my thumb up so that I have a harder time making exposure adjustments. That does seem to speed the lens up, and it tracks flying birds better that way, as this series of images of a northern harrier (hen harrier, or marsh hawk) will show.
But, for small birds in the brush, the new lens is hit or miss, with far too many misses, like this shot of a black-throated blue warbler which should have been very good.
I was so ticked off at the new lens after reviewing my photos each night that on the third day, I went back to the Beast (Sigma 150-500 mm lens). It may not have the absolute quality of the new lens, but 95%of the photos that I shoot with it are at minimum, good photos, unless I’m the reason the photos aren’t good.
You can even see the plover’s slightly web feet, which are what gave it its name.
(all of these photos and more will be added to the posts already done in the My Photo Life List project)
So, I’ve been in a quandary, what should I do?
I love the Beast for its reliability, see a bird, get good photo of bird, but it’s still a beast to carry, and it doesn’t close focus well.
The new lens can produce better photos, about one out of twenty when it comes to small birds, but it’s light, easy to carry, and does great on flowers, insects, and flying birds.
I have even gone so far as to carry both lenses with me on very short walks, but I’m not tough enough to do that for any more than a mile or so total. And then, I don’t bring either of my short lenses with me for these types of photos.
It was too nice of a day to stay home today, so I went to the Muskegon area with my first stop at Lane’s Landing to look for the prothonotary warbler that I saw earlier this week. I had no luck finding it, but I did get better images of great crested flycatchers.
On my way back to my vehicle, I was weighing the pros and cons of the two lenses I’ve been writing about, and what I should do. I won’t recount the entire debate That I had with myself, I’ll only say that I came to the conclusion that I have to make the new lens work and work well, I paid too much for it not to use it, and the Beast is still a beast to carry.
Long time readers may remember that I have two Canon 60 D bodies, one that I have set for wildlife, and the other is set for landscapes and macros. I also have another L series lens, a 70-200 mm.
I’ve also had trouble getting the 70-200 mm lens to auto-focus accurately 100% of the time on the wildlife body, it seemed to function better on the second body when I purchased the second body and tested my lenses on it.
So, I decided that I would bite the bullet and change all the settings on the landscape body over to use it on birds and go to the Muskegon Lake Nature preserve to give that combination the torture test.
The Muskegon Lake Nature Preserve is almost all very thick brush, made even worse for photography now because all the brush is beginning to leaf out. I went looking for small birds lurking in the shade or hiding behind branches, as all I wanted to do was to test was the auto-focus of the new lens on the second camera body.
The difference in performance between the two bodies with the new lens was amazing! There were a few clinkers, but no more than I would have expected if I had used the Beast on the body that I use for wildlife, and I’m not sure if the Beast could have pulled off the warbling vireo photos that I shot.
But, just a few photos aren’t a good enough test, however, I do think that some how, for some reason, the second body performs better as far as auto-focusing with the L series lenses. As soon as I put the focusing spot on a bird and used either the shutter release or the rear button, the lens snapped into focus on what I had put the spot on. It didn’t hunt like it normally does on the first body, nor did it focus on other things in the frame. That was especially noticeable in the low light photos that I shot.
So, I’ll do more testing of the new lens on the second body, and the Beast on that body as well, and see how things work. I should really bite the bullet and swap all the settings in both bodies right now, as the auto-focus isn’t that important for landscapes shot with a wide lens stopped down for depth of field, and I always manually focus for macros. In fact, I think that’s what I’ll do when I get the time.
Right now, I’m gong to get caught up with the posts that you’ve all done while I was up north.
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
American Bittern, Botaurus lentiginosus
Note: this post, while published, is a work in progress, as are all posts in this series, My Photo Life List. My goal is to photograph every species of bird that is seen on a regular basis here in Michigan, working from a list compiled by the Michigan chapter of the Audubon Society. This will be a lifelong project, that I began in January of 2013, and as I shoot better photos of this, or any other species, I will update the post for that species with better photos when I can. While this series is not intended to be a field guide per se, my minimum standard for the photos in this series is that one has to be able to make a positive identification of the species in my photos. The information posted here is from either my observations or the Wikipedia, the online free encyclopedia, however, I have personally shot all the photos appearing in this series.
American Bittern, Botaurus lentiginosus
The American Bittern is a wading bird of the heron family.
It is a large, chunky, brown bird, very similar to the Eurasian Great Bittern (Botaurus stellaris), though slightly smaller. It is 58–85 cm (23–33 in) in length, with a 92–115 cm (36–45 in) wingspan and a body mass of 370–1,072 g (0.816–2.363 lb).
Although common in much of its range, the American Bittern is usually well-hidden in bogs, marshes and wet meadows. Usually solitary, it walks stealthily among cattails or bulrushes. If it senses that it has been seen, the American Bittern becomes motionless, with its bill pointed upward, causing it to blend into the reeds. It is most active at dusk. More often heard than seen, this bittern has a call that resembles a congested pump.
Like other members of the heron family, the American Bittern feeds in marshes and shallow ponds, dining on amphibians, fish, insects and reptiles.
This bittern winters in the southern United States and Central America. It summers throughout Canada and much of the United States. As a long-distance migrant, it is a very rare vagrant in Europe, including Great Britain and Ireland. This bird nests in isolated places with the female building the nest and the male guarding it. Two or three eggs are incubated by the female for 29 days, and the chicks leave after 6–7 weeks.
On to my photos:
This is number 158 in my photo life list, only 192 to go!
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Spring vacation 2014, the 4th day
It was raining lightly off and on when I woke up on Wednesday morning, another very dark and dreary day. As I drank my coffee, I pondered where I should go and what I should do, as I hoped that the weather would improve. I was surprised by the rain after the sunset the night before, but I was in northern Michigan, where it doesn’t take much for it to rain.
Being near  the “tip of the mitt” as the area is known, a small area of land surrounded by two of the Great Lakes, it is a maritime climate there.
Anyway, I did my morning tour around the campground and came up with these photos, starting with a red squirrel’s antics.
I had seen and heard bird calls coming from a marsh behind my campsite, so checking the marsh out, I found this.
Returning to my campsite for more coffee, I found that a pair of geese were thinking of joining me.
I looked towards the river and saw a pair of common mergansers headed downstream and set off after them, hoping to get to a bend in the river before they did. On the way, I spotted this wood duck, but since he had seen me, I thought my best option was to continue after the mergansers, and then to try to sneak up on the wood duck later, after he had settled down.
In the very poor light, this was my best image of one of the mergansers.
But when I stepped into an opening for that photo, the wood duck saw me again, and took off, so I never did get a better photo.
But, the geese were still feeding in my campsite.
Here’s the rest of the photos from the morning.
While hiking the Mason Tract the day before, I learned that there is a dirt road that runs parallel to the pathway and that there are several points where there are parking areas where the pathway and road come very close together. I had chosen one of those points to turn around at the day before, and that’s where I picked up from on this day.
I did the last three miles (and back) of the Mason tract pathway, I didn’t do the Thayer’s Creek loop, as it was closed due to high water over the bridge that spans Thayer’s Creek, or at least that’s what the signs said.
Once again, I saw just one other person the entire time that I was hiking and sitting, it was if I had the entire Mason Tract to myself! I did even more sitting than on the previous day as well, since the weather had improved a little over the day before, it was almost sunny for short periods of time.
It looked like a dandelion to me, but the stem looked different, and there were no leaves at the base, so I believe that I have seen my first colt’s foot.
I think that you can see that the clouds had really thickened up again by the time that I had finished my hike for the day. On my way back to my campsite, I listened to the weather forecast for the next few days, and every station had the same forecast, rain and snow for the next three days. It even sprinkled a little on my way back to the campground.
So, I wimped out, when I arrived back at Goose Creek where I was staying, I packed up and headed home. I had already spent three days in rainy weather, and even though I don’t mind hiking in the rain, and the temperatures weren’t going to be much below freezing, three more days of gloomy weather were not what I had been looking forward to. I knew that I wasn’t going to spend the entire two weeks of my vacation camping, so it seemed like a good time to come home, shower, and resupply for my next trip north.
Which, as this is published, I will be on. I’m getting ready to leave as soon as I finish this, I’ll be spending a few days near Alpena, Michigan chasing birds, then go from there as the mood strikes me.
In fact, I feel as if I should apologize for the quality of this post, as I am rushing through it so that I can be on my way. I’ll respond to comments when I return home.
That’s all for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Spring vacation 2014, the 3rd day
It was raining lightly off and on when I woke up on Tuesday morning, another very dark and dreary day. As I drank my coffee, I pondered where I should go and what I should do, as I hoped that the weather would improve. It did, for a little while anyway.
I decided to go hiking and birding, my plan was to locate and check out the Wakeley Lake Foot Travel Area, a United States Forest Service nature preserve in the Huron Manistee National Forest. But, being the silly goose that I am, I hadn’t written down the directions on how to get there. I had remembered seeing signs for it in the past, and I  thought that if I went to the area it was in, that I would see the signs again. I didn’t, but the Mason Tract is in the same area, and I had only hiked the southern end of the Mason Tract trail, so I thought that this day would be a good one to  hike more of that trail, since it is one of my new favorite areas. Here’s a little about it from the Michigan DNR’s website.
Mason Tract: A 4,493 acre special management area along the South Branch of the Au Sable River designed to protect the quality fishing waters of this area. The Mason Tract originated from acceptance of a 1500-acre gift from The George Mason family in 1954. Over time, additional acreage has been acquired from the US Forest Service and private individuals through land exchanges. The Mason gift was contingent the area be used as a permanent game preserve, no part shall ever be sold by the state, and no camping be allowed in the area for 25 years. The State of Michigan has continued the no camping restriction in the Mason Tract. The only camping allowed is within Canoe Harbor State Forest Campground, located at the north end of the Tract on the Au Sable River. The Mason Tract offers quality fishing, hunting, and canoeing opportunities. The Mason Tract is home to the pristine Mason Chapel. The Mason Family constructed the Chapel in 1960 to provide fishermen with a place of reverence and has developed into a popular tourist attraction. The Mason Tract also contains the Mason Tract Pathway, which is used for hiking and cross-country skiing. Mountain biking on the Mason Tract Pathway is prohibited via a Director’s Order.
The Mason Tract Pathway is a little over nine miles in length if you take the direct trail, almost twelve miles long if you take the Thayer’s Creek loop and campground loop which is far too long for me to do in one day by myself, as I would have had to hike all the way back to my vehicle, doubling the length of my hike. So, I decided that since I had done the south third of the trail, that on this day, I would start on the north end and hike three miles in, then four miles back, by taking the campground loop on my way back. I saw one other person during my entire hike, they were doing just the campground loop.
Here are a few of the photos that I shot while there.
The sun was almost breaking through the clouds at that point, but they soon thickened up again for the rest of my hike.
Not a great angle, but it was the best of many oven bird photos that I shot.
In a reverse of what normally happens, I got an image of a black-throated green warbler flying towards me.
As I was going to shoot a photo of the warbler perched, I was distracted momentarily by this guy.
Then I returned to the warbler.
I’m not sure if this next plant is a species of moss or not.
I was able to get better photos of a blackburnian warbler than what I had saved on my computer for when I do a post on them in the My Photo Life List project.
I could hear a tanager singing and calling, and as I tried to locate him, he flew to directly over my head to pose for these rather poor photos, but I’m including them for the record.
Just a species of mushroom that I saw frequently while up north.
Despite the poor weather, I was able to get some better images of a Nashville warbler, this one showing its brown crown, which they don’t always do.
I was surprised by how tame the chipmunks were, and how close I was able to get to them.
I saw many of these butterflies, but couldn’t get a photo of one with its wings spread.
And finally, this junco for the record.
This is my opinion, for what it’s worth, I would skip the part of the Mason Tract Pathway from the north parking lot to past the campground loop, unless you want to be able to say that you’ve done the entire pathway. The nearly one mile of trail from the parking lot to the junction of the campground loop is rather boring northern Michigan open jack pine scrub and not very scenic.
The campground loop is very nice, with a good view of the river (sorry, I didn’t take a short lens) and two small wetlands around springs that feed the river. I would hike that again many times.
Even better is from the campground south, that’s the true Mason Tract, and you get the feeling of being in an unspoiled wilderness!
A great feature of this pathway is that they have placed benches at each of the signposts along the trail, making convenient rest stops spaced out along the way. There’s a map at every signpost, although not all the maps have the distances on them. But, that’s a small detail. It was so nice to sit out in the woods with no one or no sounds other than nature all around me. I may not have taken many photos, but it was a very enjoyable day!
On my way back to my campground, I saw the signs for Wakeley Lake, so I had to stop. Even though I had already hiked seven miles, I did the short one mile beaver pond loop at Wakeley Lake.
I had seen the evidence of woodpeckers everywhere I had gone, I had heard them, including a pileated, but this is the only one that I was able to get a photo of the entire time I was up north. Strange, very strange.
It was raining again by then, a small thunder shower was passing just to the south, so the photos aren’t very good, but here’s the rest from Wakeley Lake.
The Wakeley Lake area is a federal facility, and there’s a $5 fee to access it. That irks me, as there are no real improvements there, they charge the $5 just to access a wilderness area? But, I broke the law and didn’t pay, I wanted to get a feel for the place to see if it was worth returning to at a later date.
I would say that it is, so the next time, I will pay, and hike more of the trails there, even if I disagree with the government charging us to access what our tax dollars have already paid for.
After returning to my campground, and eating supper, I did my tour of the campground at dusk, and found this.
The night before, she and her mate had perched in the same tree, but that was while I was fishing, and didn’t have my camera with me. Argh!
A few minutes later is when I shot these, seen in a previous post.
After that, there was nothing to do but eat supper, and turn in for the night. It’s too bad that the owls didn’t do the same. I had heard them before, but on this night, they decided to use one of the large white pine trees that I had my tent/cot set up under to use as a rendezvous point. I have to tell you that I woke up to some strange sounds that had me scratching my head trying to figure out what was making the sounds. It sounded as if whatever was making the sounds was in or on my tent!
It wasn’t any of the classic sounds that owls typically make, it almost sounded like a canine’s bark, and I wondered if there were coyotes outside of my tent. But then, I heard the second owl answering the barks of the first one from off in the distance with a plain hoot, and getting closer each time it hooted. Eventually, both owls ended up in the tree over my tent, and I’m not sure, but I think that they were making owlets over where I was trying to sleep. Whatever they were doing up there, they sure were noisy! Eventually they flew off, and I was able to get back to sleep.
I had considered getting up, going for my camera and a flashlight, and trying for photos, but I doubted if it would be worth the effort. I listened to the sounds of owls of common Michigan species on eBird to try to identify the sounds, but couldn’t. The plain hoots that I heard could have been made by several species, but I’d be lying if I tried to make a positive ID. My best guess is great horned owls, but that’s only a guess.
I’m heading back up north this morning shortly after this is published, so I may not get around to replying to comments you may leave until next week.
That’s all for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Glaucous Gull, Larus hyperboreus
Note: this post, while published, is a work in progress, as are all posts in this series, My Photo Life List. My goal is to photograph every species of bird that is seen on a regular basis here in Michigan, working from a list compiled by the Michigan chapter of the Audubon Society. This will be a lifelong project, that I began in January of 2013, and as I shoot better photos of this, or any other species, I will update the post for that species with better photos when I can. While this series is not intended to be a field guide per se, my minimum standard for the photos in this series is that one has to be able to make a positive identification of the species in my photos. The information posted here is from either my observations or the Wikipedia, the online free encyclopedia, however, I have personally shot all the photos appearing in this series.
Glaucous Gull, Larus hyperboreus
The glaucous gull is a large gull which breeds in the Arctic regions of the northern hemisphere and the Atlantic coasts of Europe. It is migratory, wintering from in the North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans as far south as the British Isles and northernmost states of the USA, also on the Great Lakes. A few birds sometimes reach the southern USA and northern Mexico.
This species breeds colonially or singly on coasts and cliffs, making a lined nest on the ground or cliff. Normally, 2–4 light brown eggs with dark chocolate splotches are laid.
This is a large and powerful gull, very pale in all plumages, with no black on either of the wings or the tail. The term glaucous describes its colouration. Adults are pale grey above, with a thick yellow bill. Immatures are very pale grey with a pink and black bill. This species is considerably larger, bulkier and thicker-billed than the similar Iceland Gull, and can sometimes equal the size of the Great Black-backed Gull, the largest gull species. They can weigh anywhere from 960 to 2,700 g (2.12 to 5.95 lb), averaging 1.55 kg (3.4 lb) in males and 1.35 kg (3.0 lb) in females. These gulls range from 55 to 77 cm (22 to 30 in) in length and can span 132 to 170 cm (52 to 67 in) across the wings. Among standard measurements, the wing chord is 40.8 to 50.1 cm (16.1 to 19.7 in), the bill is 4.9 to 6.9 cm (1.9 to 2.7 in) and the tarsus is 6 to 7.7 cm (2.4 to 3.0 in). They take four years to reach maturity. The call is a “laughing” cry similar to that of the Herring Gull but deeper.
These are omnivores like most Larus gulls, and they will eat fish, insects, molluscs, starfish, offal, scraps, eggs, small birds, small mammals and carrion as well as seeds, berries and grains.
On to my photos:
- Glaucous Gull, Larus hyperboreus
This is number 157 in my photo life list, only 193 to go!
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
A quick update
I’m running behind on getting my posts done from the four days I was up north, and I’ll get further behind the way that things are going around here. This post will be more words than photos and focused mainly on my camera gear, so if you’re easily bored, you may want to skip this one, although I’ll have to throw in a few photos.
A quick overview of what’s been going on in my life since I returned home, but before I begin, I have bitten the bullet and purchased more storage space from WordPress, so that I’ll be able to continue to post photos.
On Thursday, the weather was miserable, with temps in the 40’s, along with wind and rain, but I still managed a lifer, a blue headed vireo.
On Friday, with only slightly better weather, I went to the Pickerel Lake Nature Preserve, and shot a ton of photos of migrating birds, including another lifer, a Cape May Warbler.
On Saturday, the local camera store where I have purchased the majority of my photo equipment had the reps from most of the manufacturers whose equipment they sell in the store for the day to answer questions. That’s the boring part, I’ll get back to that later, other than to say that I learned a lot in an hour talking to the one knowledgeable member of the sales staff ably assisted by the Canon rep.
After that, I went to a wetland near the store to test what I had learned.
And despite some ominous looking clouds at times….
…I went to the local park to further test my new knowledge.
On Sunday, I went to the Muskegon area, visiting several places within the Muskegon State Game area, along with the Muskegon Lake Nature Preserve, and got another lifer, a blue winged warbler.
That, along with a few other (dozen) of the species that I see more often, including a yellow warbler showing me its tongue….
…and a juvenile bald eagle.
Okay, on to the boring bits. (There will be a few more photos, I promise, some may even be good)
I said that on Saturday that I went to the local camera store to talk to the Canon rep, I learned more about the technical aspects, mainly software related, what the camera can and can’t do, and most importantly, the why behind it all.
My main question was why couldn’t I get the new 300 mm prime lens to auto-focus as accurately on birds as does the Beast. (Sigma 150-500 mm lens).
As you may know, every brand of camera has a processor, or computer in it, as do almost all, if not all, of the lenses on the market these days. There’s a lot that happens when you press the shutter release of a modern camera half way down, including starting the auto-focus system to go into action, along with exposure control, the camera alerting the lens what aperture the lens should set itself to, white balance adjustments, and so on.
So, the first thing that I learned was that the button on the rear of my 60 D body that I thought was the focus lock was really a button to make the camera and lens auto-focus only, and not to “talk” to each other about anything else, until they achieved a focus lock.
All the other communications between the body and lens slows down how quickly that they can work to get a focus lock when you press the shutter release half way down.
Oh boy, another button to play with! Now I need a few more fingers. đŸ˜‰ Actually, using the rear auto-focus button is quite easy in practice. I’m not sure that using it speeds things up that much, as I lose a little time pressing the shutter release after the camera alerts me that it has achieved a focus lock, but it seems to. It also seems slightly more accurate, on Saturday, I would have said the difference was 80% better, but after Sunday, I would drop that to 25%. That’s mainly due to the differences in lighting and subjects between the two days. The rear button auto-focus helps, but doesn’t solve the problem.
After this morning, I’m not sure if all the problem is really the auto-focusing of the new lens after all, but I’ll get to that in a minute.
My problem is made more difficult because I’m using a Tamron 1.4 X tele-converter with the 300 mm lens. Optically, the Tamron extender is great, but it doesn’t speak the exact same language as the Canon body and lens do. I think that I received an honest answer when I asked if I would see better performance if I used a Canon extender and was told that I would see a slight increase in performance, and that a Canon extender wouldn’t totally solve the problem.
Next up, high ISO. The weather and lighting were so poor on Thursday that for the first time ever, I set my camera to go as high as ISO 6400. The images I got weren’t the same as if I had been able to shoot at ISO 100 by any means, but there wasn’t as much sensor noise as I had feared that there would be. I asked about that on Saturday, and if the 300 mm prime lens could or would make a difference.
The short answer is yes. One thing that I have really liked about the new lens is how clear, as well as sharp, everything looks in my photos when I use it. The Beast comes very close to matching the new lens in sharpness, as you will soon see, but the images are still not quite as clear as the new lens produces.
That clarity, or, the technical term is resolution, of the new lens, is what cuts down on sensor noise at high ISO settings when I use it. The imperfections in the glass of the lenses give the sensor something to “read” as it records a photo, causing more noise than if the glass were truly perfect, which no glass is. But, the better the glass used in a lens, the less sensor noise will be apparent in your photos.
Side note to all the well-meaning people who warned me about sensor noise being bad with a Canon 60 D body, thanks, but you didn’t know what you were talking about. I wouldn’t say that ISO 2500 is all that high, but this photos was shot at that setting this morning. And, most of the photos that I have taken at ISO settings above 3200 have come out well enough that I’m happy with them. I guess it’s a matter of how much sensor noise one can tolerate, along with the quality of lenses used.
And, that was shot with the Beast, not the new lens!
Okay, another piece of the auto-focus problem that I have with the new lens is its higher resolution (clarity) and because Canon programs their lenses to “see” smaller things in the frame when auto-focusing than what Sigma does from the looks of my photos. Often, there’s a twig or leaf in front of the bird that I’m trying to photograph, and the obstruction is in focus when I use the new lens, but the Beast doesn’t “see” the obstruction, and focuses on the larger subject, the bird behind it.
But, there’s more to it than that, I think that exposure settings come into play as well, especially after a little more testing that I did this morning. I took both the Beast and the new lens to the local park that I walk each morning, and put them through some testing, building on what I had learned Saturday, and in practice since then.
Unfortunately, I didn’t swap lenses back and forth on the same subjects, but I noticed one thing right away. The Canon body stops the Beast down to a smaller aperture than it does the new lens, whether or not I’m using the new lens with the extender. That gives the Beast a larger depth of field to assist in getting more in focus than the new lens. I manually opened up the Beast to the same settings that I see when I use the new lens, and I got twigs and leaves in focus, but the bird behind them out of focus, just what I get with the new lens. Hmmm.
Anyway, my shots with the new lens, not using the extender.
Unfortunately, the birds wouldn’t play nice while I had the new lens on, but here’s what I shot with the Beast this morning.
So, now I find myself in a bit of a quandary, despite everything that I’ve written in this post, the Beast is simply better than the new lens at getting photos of small birds in thick brush. I got so frustrated with the new lens yesterday at the Muskegon Lake Nature Preserve that I took the extender off from the new lens and tried that set-up for smaller birds trying to hide. It helped a little, but not that much.
But, I was blown away by the sharpness of the photos that I did get.
American robin
They are super sharp, but are they really that much better than what the Beast produces?
Part of the reason for all this is that I missed a Prothonotary warbler on Sunday, as the new lens with the extender was too slow, and by the time I got the warbler in focus, it took off. I’m not positive that I could have gotten the photo with the Beast, but I would have had a better chance with it than the new lens.
Well, that and the fact that I hiked six to eight miles a day while I was on vacation, and I was sure glad not to be dragging the Beast with me that far. However, there were times when I wished that I had taken the Beast as I was fighting the new lens to get a good photo of a bird.
But, my problem is the same as always, I go from trying to get a warbler in a thicket of brush to shooting an eagle circling over me, and there’s no ideal lens for both, not to mention all the other subjects that I photograph.
I’m going to have to use the Beast when I go on a serious birding trip like Muskegon on Sunday, even if I miss the close focusing capabilities of the new lens for blooms and bugs. And, even if the Beast doesn’t do birds in flight as well as the new lens does.
I think that I can play with the new lens around here some more, to learn how to get it to focus the way that I would like it to. And, stop the lens down a little whenever I can to get a greater depth of field. I do know that the new lens performs much better in low light than the Beast as well.
But, if I go on any longer, I’ll be repeating myself as I think all of this through.
Now then, to completely change the subject, the weather is forecast to clear up Wednesday, and be nice right through the weekend, so I’ll be headed back up north Wednesday morning. I have groceries to buy and such to get ready to go, so I have to concentrate on that.
So, that’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Spring vacation 2014, the 2nd day
It was raining lightly off and on when I woke up on Monday morning, a very dark and dreary day. As I drank my coffee, I pondered where I should go and what I should do, as I hoped that the weather would improve. It didn’t, instead, the rain picked up to a steady, moderate rainfall. I didn’t feel like trying to cook outside in the rain, and I sure didn’t feel like eating my soggy cooking in the rain either.
But, I had planned somewhat for bad weather, that’s why I chose Goose Creek campground to stay in for at least the first few days, it’s only a few miles west of Grayling, Michigan. Hartwick Pines State Park is just a few miles north of Grayling, so I decided to run into town, get something to eat, then start my day at Hartwick Pines.
One reason, besides the weather, is that I have always seen evening grosbeaks at Hartwick Pines, and I needed photos of them for the My Life List project that I’m working on. Another reason is that Hartwick Pines State Park is one of the crown jewels of Michigan’s excellent state park system. Here’s a bit of the history of the place from the Michigan DNR’s website.
“With an area of 9,672 acres, Hartwick Pines is one of the largest state parks in the Lower Peninsula. The park’s rolling hills, which are built of ancient glacial deposit, overlook the valley of the East Branch of the AuSable River, four small lakes and unique timber lands. The principal feature of this park is the 49-acre forest of Old Growth Pines which gives the park its name. This forest is a reminder of Michigan’s past importance in the pine lumber industry as well as a source of inspiration for the future of our forests. The park is rich in scenic beauty and because of the different habitats it encompasses, there is ample subject matter for the sports person, photographer, or naturalist throughout the year. The park is open from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. year round.
The Story Behind The Pines In 1927, Karen Michelson Hartwick purchased over 8,000 acres of land, which included 85 acres of old growth white pine, from the Salling-Hanson Company of Grayling. Mrs. Hartwick was a daughter of Nels Michelson, a founding partner of the Salling-Hanson logging company. A short while later, Mrs. Hartwick donated the land to the State of Michigan as a memorial park to be named for her husband, the late Major Edward E. Hartwick of Grayling. Edward Hartwick had died overseas during World War I. Also wishing to commemorate the logging history of the region and of her family, Karen Hartwick requested that the Hartwick Pines Logging Museum be built in the park.
In 1934 and 1935, a Civilian Conservation Corps work crew located within the park built two log structures to house this museum. Today, the museum uses exhibits, artifacts, and photographs, to recreate the atmosphere of a logging camp and tell the tale of the “shanty boys” who turned Michigan’s vast forests into timber. Period settings depicting a bunkhouse, mess hall, blacksmith shop, camp office, and van (store) give the visitor a sense of what logging camp life was like.
Mrs. Hartwick was also involved in the naming of two of the park’s lakes. Nels Michelson had a team of oxen which he used for skidding logs out of the forest. They were named Bright and Star. Karen Hartwick requested that the former Alexander Lakes be renamed in their honor. The state board of geographic names felt that there were already too many Star Lakes in Michigan, but they settled on Glory instead, and our Bright Lake and Glory Lake became named after logging oxen.
In November of 1940, a fierce wind storm struck the area of the park and removed nearly half of the old growth pine. Today, only 49 of the original 85 acres remain standing.”
Since that was written, more wind storms, disease, and old age have taken their toll on the old giants which once stood in the park, there are just a few remaining now. However, it’s still a magnificent feeling to stand under one of the giant white pines that do remain, and look up in awe as they seem to go on forever, reaching almost to the clouds.
But, I couldn’t figure out how to capture that in a photo, I’m not sure it can be done in a stand of trees like they are.
I’ve been through the logging museum a few times, it is well worth a visit in it’s own right if you’re ever in the area. So, I’ll start with a few photos of the larger equipment outdoors to give you a little feel for the place. I’d have taken photos in the museum buildings, but they had school tours going through them, and all the displays are behind glass, and it’s hard to get good flash photos shooting through glass.
I did find the evening grosbeaks, and a few other critters.
On my way out, I stopped at the visitor’s center to thank the employees for doing such a great job with the park, as they are always very helpful and knowledgeable. I started chatting with one of the employees, and he gave me a tip on the location of a bog that had been on part of the hiking trail system in the park, but the boardwalk through the bog had fallen into disrepair.
Unfortunately, there were two decades when our Michigan DNR, which oversees our park system, was severely underfunded, and many needed repairs weren’t done. Hopefully, that has changed with the new system of funding our parks that we have here in Michigan now. But it will be years before the DNR is able to catch up on the maintenance, although you can already see major improvements.
Anyway, I found the bog, I didn’t find any birds, but what a place! I have a feeling that Allen, who does the New Hampshire Gardening Solutions blog would go crazy if he ever saw that bog, the plants amazed me, and I know little about them. Â I want to go back later in the year when the plants are flowering! Here’s a very small sampling of what I found.
By then, it was pouring down rain between thundershowers. Not exactly great weather for photos, or photography equipment, which is why I got so few photos.
I did stop at Bright and Glory Lakes between downpours.
The rain let up a little, so I tried fishing the east branch of the AuSable River for a while, but couldn’t even turn a brook trout.
So, I did a little exploring by car, as there are so many places I have yet to find, and here’s what I came up with as far as photos.
Arriving back at the campground, I noticed one benefit to all the rain, jelly mold showing up on the railings next to the river. So, in a break between rain showers, I set up my tripod, and did further testing with the Tokina macro lens, starting with a test shot.
This next one is as close as I can get with just the Tokina lens.
And, this is as close as I can get with the 1.4 X extender behind the lens.
I must have bumped the tripod when I added the extender, since I didn’t get the exact same molds as in the second shot, but these were about the same size. None of the photos were cropped at all. I used the LCD panel light for lighting, and for the first time ever, I had it turned up as high as it would go as far as light output, and I could have used more.
After that, there was nothing to do but eat supper, and turn in for the night.
That’s all for this one, thanks for stopping by!
My vacation, spring (???) 2014, an overview
Okay, I knew that I wouldn’t be camping for the two entire weeks of my vacation without at least a couple of days back home, but so far, the weather is not cooperating at all. When the forecast for Thursday through Saturday called for more rain, rain/snow mix, and a stiff north wind, I decided to come home for a few days. And, as I am editing this on Friday, the area where I was did indeed see accumulating snow this morning.
I left home early on Sunday morning, and had my camp set up in Goose Creek State Forest Campground on the banks of the upper Manistee River before 2 PM. It was warm and sunny then, I was wearing just a light short-sleeved T-shirt and jeans.
But before I get into the details of the trip, a few other thoughts first.
First, my Cabela’s tent/cot is a breeze to set-up and take down. I slept fairly well in it, given that it was really warmer than what my sleeping bag is designed for. I was too warm inside the first two nights, but since I wasn’t sure just how weather proof the tent/cot was, I didn’t dare open up the windows or other ventilation very much the first night. I got a little braver each night, as I found out that the unit does protect from the elements very well. That was important, because it rained off and on from the first evening that I was there, right through Wednesday evening, when I packed up to return home.
My biggest problem was condensation inside the unit, because I hadn’t opened up the ventilation as I should. I’ll know better next time. But, I don’t think that any tent would have been able to deal with the weather from Monday to Wednesday morning. The humidity was so high that it was foggy for much of the time.
Also, it was a lot easier to use the tent/cot in my living room when I tested it at home than it was outdoors in real use, but it will do what I intended it to do. It’s quick and easy to set up, or take down, but if one is claustrophobic, I wouldn’t recommend one of these tent/cots to them. đŸ˜‰
I tried fishing a few times when I was sure that there were no thunder showers in the area, I don’t mind fishing in the rain, it can be a great time to fish, but I won’t stand in the middle of a river, holding a graphite fly rod in my hand, while there’s lightning nearby. I fished for at least a little while on several evenings, and all I could manage is one hit from a small trout, which is about as well as any of the other fishermen that I spoke to were doing. It was a long, tough winter for the trout as well as people.
The big story was the weather. It started raining, with an occasional passing thundershower Sunday evening right on through until Tuesday evening, and it rained at least a little each day. Monday and Tuesday, there was more time when it was raining than not. Sunday and Monday were very warm, hot even, especially for up there this time of the year. It cooled off to about average for Tuesday and Wednesday. There were a few short peeks at the sun on every day as well, with Sunday being the brightest day. Wednesday was cloudy most of the time, with just a few light sprinkles of rain a couple of times, but at least the fog was gone that had been around most of Monday and Tuesday.
It was so gloomy most of the time that I set the ISO of my camera to go as high as 3200 on auto, but even that wasn’t high enough. I shot some photos at ISO 3200, f/5.6, and a shutter speed of 1/80 of a second, not nearly fast enough for the new 300 mm prime lens and the extender behind it for a total of 420 mm. Not even as steady as I am, or the lens’ IS could get great photos under the conditions I had to work with most of the time. But, that didn’t stop me from trying. đŸ˜‰
I probably should have switched to the Beast (Sigma 150-500 mm lens), but I was hiking long distances each day. For the two nicer days, I also brought the second body and short lenses, and six to eight miles with the Beast is more than enough by itself. When I didn’t bring the other gear, the 300 mm prime did the job for macro photos as well as it can, which is quite good. Besides, the 300 mm prime is better weather sealed than the Beast, and that was important.
About all that I could do was hike, the weather wasn’t any good for much else. I did get some fishing in at times, but it was too wet and rainy to just sit around the campground as I had planned on doing. I need one of those canopies to set up to provide cover if I’m going to just sit outside and it’s raining.
But, I have to be serious, I’m not much of a sitter. I may not move fast or far, but I can’t just sit still for very long doing nothing either. When I did sit, it was out in the woods most of the time, and even then, not for very long. I’m the type that wants to see what’s over the next hill or around the next bend.
My best photo from my time up there is this one, taken Tuesday evening, when the bulk of the rain finally ended.
A close second is this one, same time and place, slightly different position.
I tried a few other landscapes, but none of them are very good as far as subject matter, except for this one.
That was shot on Tuesday morning. I had been drinking my coffee, leaning on the railing next to the river that you can see in the second sunset photo. I was thinking that even though I had images of many species of birds, that I hadn’t gotten any lifers so far on this trip, and that was disappointing to me. I thought to myself that just being there used to be enough to keep me contented, that I used to think that this was one of the truly special places in Michigan, then it hit me. It still is, I’m just so used to seeing it that it is more like an old friend than anything else, but other people haven’t seen it, so I should grab my camera and tripod, and capture the moment.
So, I ran around the area shooting landscapes using live view, which was a mistake. Little did I know that the lens had fogged up from the extremely high humidity, even though the camera and lens had been sitting in my vehicle all night, and should have been the same temperature as the air. When I looked at the camera screen, I thought that the camera was seeing the fog thicker than I was with my naked eye, so I never checked the lens. That’s the only photo that turned out at all, because it was the first one that I shot, before the lens fogged over completely. Lesson learned.
Also, I am happy to report that after four days of counting yellow-rumped warblers, that there’s a gazillion of them, give or take a hundred billion here or there. The sheer number of them interfered with my getting photos of other species. They were everywhere I went, and in huge numbers. I’d see a small bird, pull the camera to my eye, get a focus lock, and at least 95% of the time, it was a yellow-rumped, from here on in to be known as YRW’s.
I started to assume that any warbler perched long enough for me to get a good look at it was a YRW. They were on the ground, in the brush, in the air, and in the treetops, there were times when I had 20 in sight at the same time.
They had infested the campground, just as everywhere else that I went, so naturally, one of them will appear as my first bird photos.
Those were shot while I strolled around the campground, checking it out, as were these.
It was still only mid-afternoon, so I drove up to the De Ward Tract, which I have written about before, there’s info about it in my hiking places pages if you’re curious. I walked along the bluff on the east side of the river for a mile or so, and only saw YRW in the brush below me, other than a lone kingfisher, the photo of it was too bad to post. But, I found a few interesting things to shoot.
I wasn’t finding much to photograph, and it was quite warm, above 80 degrees F ( 27 C), so I returned to the campground for these.
I don’t know if this grackle was fascinated by its own reflection, or if it was watching something in the water.
But he kept getting closer….
…and closer…
…until he went in!
One way or the other, it didn’t take him long to get out of the water, it was still very cold, as I found out when I fished later on.
This palm warbler looked on, wondering what the grackle was doing.
Then resumed looking for insects.
That’s it for the photos from the first day.
I slipped into my waders, and spent the rest of the day fishing. I fished all the way through the campground, and had one hit the entire time. That was the best that I did of all the times I tried fishing.
Just as I was finishing my supper, the rain started, so I slipped into my tent cot, and called it a night.
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Trumpeter Swan, Cygnus buccinator
Note: this post, while published, is a work in progress, as are all posts in this series, My Photo Life List. My goal is to photograph every species of bird that is seen on a regular basis here in Michigan, working from a list compiled by the Michigan chapter of the Audubon Society. This will be a lifelong project, that I began in January of 2013, and as I shoot better photos of this, or any other species, I will update the post for that species with better photos when I can. While this series is not intended to be a field guide per se, my minimum standard for the photos in this series is that one has to be able to make a positive identification of the species in my photos. The information posted here is from either my observations or the Wikipedia, the online free encyclopedia, however, I have personally shot all the photos appearing in this series.
Trumpeter Swan, Cygnus buccinator
The Trumpeter Swan is a species of swan found in North America.
The Trumpeter Swan is the largest extant species of waterfowl. Adults usually measure 138–165 cm (4 ft 6 in–5 ft 5 in) long, though large males can range up to 180 cm (71 in) or more in total length. The weight of adult birds is typically 7–13.6 kg (15–30 lb), with an average weight in males of 11.9 kg (26 lb) and 9.4 kg (21 lb) in females. The wingspan ranges from 185 to 250 cm (6 ft 1 in to 8 ft 2 in), with the wing chord measuring 60–68 cm (24–27 in). The largest known male Trumpeter attained a length of 183 cm (6 ft 0 in), a wingspan of 3.1 m (10 ft 2 in) and a weight of 17.2 kg (38 lb).
The adult Trumpeter Swan is all white in plumage. As with a Whooper Swan, this species has upright posture and generally swims with a straight neck. The Trumpeter Swan has a large, wedge-shaped black bill that can, in some cases, be minimally lined with salmon-pink coloration around the mouth. The bill, measuring 10.5–12 cm (4.1–4.7 in), is up to twice the length of a Canada Goose’s (Branta canadensis) bill and is the largest of any waterfowl. The legs are gray-pink in color, though in some birds can appear yellowish gray to even black. The tarsus measures 10.5–12 cm (4.1–4.7 in). The cygnets (juveniles) are grey in appearance, becoming white after the first year.
Their breeding habitat is large shallow ponds, undisturbed lakes, pristine wetlands and wide slow rivers, and marshes in northwestern and central North America, with the largest numbers of breeding pairs found in Alaska. They prefer nesting sites with enough space for them to have enough surface water for them to take off, as well as accessible food, shallow, unpolluted water, and little or no human disturbance. Natural populations of these swans migrate to and from the Pacific coast and portions of the United States, flying in V-shaped flocks. Released populations are mostly non-migratory. In the winter, they migrate to the southern tier of Canada, the eastern part of the northwest states in the United States, especially to the Red Rock Lakes area of Montana, the north Puget Sound region of northwest Washington state, they have even been observed as far south as Pagosa Springs, Colorado. Historically, they range as far south as Texas and southern California.
These birds feed while swimming, sometimes up-ending or dabbling to reach submerged food. The diet is almost entirely aquatic plants. They will eat both the leaves and stems of submerged and emergent vegetation. They will also dig into muddy substrate underwater to extract roots and tubers. In winter, they may also eat grasses and grains in fields. They will often feed at night as well as by day. Feeding activity, and the birds’ weights, often peaks in the spring as they prepare for the breeding season. The young are fed on insects, small fish, fish eggs and small crustaceans along with plants initially, providing additional protein, changing to a vegetation-based diet over the first few months.
Trumpeter Swans often mate for life, and both parents participate in raising their young, but primarily the female incubate the eggs. Most pair bonds are formed when swans are 4 to 7 years old, although some pairs do not form until they are nearly 20 years old. “Divorces” have been known between birds, in which case the mates will be serially monogamous, with mates in differing breeding seasons. Occasionally, if his mate dies, a male Trumpeter Swan may not pair again for the rest of his life. Most egg laying occurs between late April and May. The female lays 3–12 eggs, with 4 to 6 being average, in a mound of plant material on a small island, a beaver or muskrat lodge, or a floating platform on a clump of emergent vegetation. The same location may be used for several years and both members of the pair help build the nest. The nest consists of a large, open bowl of grasses, sedges and various aquatic vegetation and have ranged in diameter from 1.2 to 3.6 m (3.9 to 11.8 ft), the latter after repeated uses. The eggs average 73 millimetres (2.9 in) wide, 113.5 millimetres (4.5 in) long, and weigh about 320 grams (11.3 oz). The incubation period is 32 to 37 days, mainly by the female, although occasionally by the male as well. The young are able to swim within two days and usually are capable of feeding themselves after at most two weeks. The fledging stage is reached at roughly 3 to 4 months. While nesting, Trumpeter Swans are territorial and harass other animals, including conspecifics, who enter the area of their nest.
Adults go through a summer moult when they temporarily lose their flight feathers. The females become flightless shortly after the young hatch; the males go through this process about a month later when the females have completed their moult.
On to my photos:
This is number 156 in my photo life list, only 194 to go!
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
Sora, Porzana carolina
Note: this post, while published, is a work in progress, as are all posts in this series, My Photo Life List. My goal is to photograph every species of bird that is seen on a regular basis here in Michigan, working from a list compiled by the Michigan chapter of the Audubon Society. This will be a lifelong project, that I began in January of 2013, and as I shoot better photos of this, or any other species, I will update the post for that species with better photos when I can. While this series is not intended to be a field guide per se, my minimum standard for the photos in this series is that one has to be able to make a positive identification of the species in my photos. The information posted here is from either my observations or the Wikipedia, the online free encyclopedia, however, I have personally shot all the photos appearing in this series.
Sora, Porzana carolina
The Sora (Porzana carolina) is a small waterbird of the family Rallidae, sometimes also referred to as the Sora Rail or Sora Crake.
Adult Soras are 19–30 cm (7.5–11.8 in) long, with dark-marked brown upper-parts, a blue-grey face and underparts, and black and white barring on the flanks. They have a short thick yellow bill, with black markings on the face at the base of the bill and on the throat. Sexes are similar, but young Soras lack the black facial markings and have a whitish face and buff breast. They weigh about 49–112 g (1.7–4.0 oz).
The Sora’s breeding habitat is marshes throughout much of North America. They nest in a well-concealed location in dense vegetation. The female usually lays 10 to 12 eggs, sometimes as many as 18, in a cup built from marsh vegetation. The eggs do not all hatch together. Both parents incubate and feed the young, who leave the nest soon after they hatch and are able to fly within a month.
They migrate to the southern United States and northern South America. Sora is a very rare vagrant to western Europe, where it can be confused with Spotted Crake. However, the latter species always has spotting on the breast. a streaked crown stripe, and a different wing pattern.
Soras forage while walking or swimming. They are omnivores, eating seeds, insects and snails. Although Soras are more often heard than seen, they are sometimes seen walking near open water. They are fairly common, despite a decrease in suitable habitat in recent times. The call is a slow whistled ker-whee, or a descending whinny. The use of call broadcasts greatly increases the chances of hearing a Sora. Call broadcasts can also increase the chances of seeing a Sora, as they will often investigate the source of the call.
On to my photos:
This is number 155 in my photo life list, only 195 to go!
That’s it for this one, thanks for stopping by!
What I’ll miss
On Saturday afternoon, after I had most of my packing done for my vacation, I took a break, and took a walk. In a way, I almost hate to leave, as spring is in full swing here, and I know that up north, I’ll be going back two to three weeks in the season. But, before I babble on about that, here’s the photos that I shot while on my walk.
There were four or five male red-winged blackbirds fighting over a female….
….I only managed to get parts of three of them in the frame.
A turkey vulture soared overhead.
One of the flowers that I’ll miss.
Some that I managed to find that were open.
My best image of a Baltimore oriole so far!
It was a bit breezy this day!
More flowers.
Sorry for so many catbirds lately, I just can’t stop myself, I love them! Not only do I enjoy listening to them, for a rather plain grey bird, I find them rather striking.
Look closely, and you can see its tongue as it tastes the sumac before swallowing it. I’m getting good at getting bird’s tongues!
It doesn’t take flowers to see great colors this time of year.
It’s funny, I was so tired of white from all the snow this past winter, but white flowers still capture my attention.
I got better photos of a Nashville warbler!
This image of a oriole isn’t as sharp as the previous one, but I love the colors and the way that the light played on his breast feathers.
Another flower.
This is Bertha, the red-tailed hawk, watching small songbirds as they watch her, there has to be a joke about bird watching there, but I can’t come up with one.
More buds that I’ll miss seeing while they are open.
That’s it for this one. It will be published while I’m gone, so it may take me a while to reply to any comments, but thanks for stopping by!
My Week, itching to go!
Monday
A few thoughts about this past weekend. I feel bad about not putting more effort into getting better photos of the wildflowers at Aman Park yesterday, but I just wasn’t feeling it. It would have been too much like work to have battled the wind any more than I did, and I want my photography to remain a fun hobby, and not become a chore.
The second thought has to do with the small wetlands that I visited, I’m such a lucky guy! I go stumbling around doing things the wrong way, and manage to come home with four relatively rare birds. In fact, the daily rare bird alert from eBird this morning is from my reported sightings on Sunday.
I have to say that it’s pretty cool to see my name attached to the rare bird sightings, but I had better be careful and not allow myself to get drawn into the world of serious birders. They are a different breed, and I won’t fit in their clique, not at all.
I met the guy who verifies the rare bird sightings in this area for eBird on Saturday, and I could tell that it irked him that I had seen a white-eyed vireo in this area before he had. Why else would he have even remembered my name or that sighting if it hadn’t bugged him? And yes, when he walked up to me, he asked if I was Jerry, and when I replied that I was, he immediately brought up the vireo sighting. They are so competitive, and I do it just for fun, which is what I think bothered him the most.
I say that I do it just for fun, I really do it out of my love of nature, and the fact that I live in a state like Michigan that has so much nature to be seen, and access to the nature. I don’t want that to change either, I want to find the birds on my list to show what a great state that I live in, how much wildlife that we have, and as a reason to wander around with a camera, not to beat any one else or to rack up big numbers.
I’ll let other people spend long hours behind a spotting scope hoping to score a major sighting, then I’ll follow them up and shoot a few photos, as I’m too lazy to put the hard work that it takes to find the rare birds in the first place. đŸ˜‰
There’s one more reason that I’ve taken on the project of trying to photograph every species of bird regularly seen in Michigan, and that is an attempt to keep my mind sharp, as well as to learn more about nature. Identifying birds is tricky at times, and it takes mental skills to do so, and I’ve learned so much already in the little over a year that it has been since I began my project.
Well, enough of that prattle, time to head on out to see what I can find today.
I’m back, another day, another lifer, at least as far as photos. I know that I have seen, and probably photographed magnolia warblers before, but when I checked my list, I don’t have that species checked off. I may have seen them before I became as serious about identifying birds as I am now.
Now, I wish that I had taken the Beast (Sigma 150-500 mm lens) with me, rather than the new 300 mm prime lens, as the prime lens didn’t achieve a good focus lock for any of my shots of the male warbler, and missed the female completely. But, the day that was forecast to be pleasant and sunny turned out to be cool, cloudy, with occasional sprinkles of rain, so I left the Beast home where it would be safe and dry.
I may have been able to try a few more photos of the warblers, but I got distracted by several juvenile white-throated sparrows in the same area, which I mistook for white-crowned sparrows at first, until I got some close-up images.
I’m going to relate my day today back to what I was writing about before I left, not wanting to become a serious birder. I see them standing back from the birds, and using high-powered binoculars and/or spotting scopes to survey an area, then move on.
That seems like a cold, sterile way of birding. Me, I like to get right in the middle of the birds and feel their life force all around me. I was in my glory the past two days at the small wetlands, there were several times that I thought that birds were going to collide with me as I worked my way through the brush, now that’s cool!
So it was today, by getting in the thicker stuff where the birds hang out, I was able to get these photos.
If you noticed, the bird that I labeled as a juvenile white-throated sparrow doesn’t have the yellow lores (area between the beak and eyes) that the second sparrow has. That’s what threw me for a while, the lack of the yellow lores.
And, that reminds me of a conversation that I had with Bruce, the guy who counts and bands birds in the Muskegon area, about how much and many variations that there are in individual birds of the same species. That also makes many birding field guides that have only one photo of the prototypical example of a species less of a help than they could be if they included a few of the known variations. But, that comes with experience, something that I accumulate a little more of everyday.
I have a few other photos from today, not great, but they were my attempts to get a usable photo in the worst of conditions.
I probably should save photos like the last ones for my own edification and not post them, but I want to pass on what I’m learning to do. Crank up the exposure compensation and forget about the background. And besides, the photos of the oriole are my first for the year, and you can see that it was feeding on something in the cottonwood catkins, or the catkins themselves.
I didn’t do a post in the My Photo Life List last week, and I won’t this week either, despite the fact that I now have five new species besides the ones that I had saved. What I’ll do is finish a few of them this week, but schedule them to be published while I’m on vacation. So, don’t be surprised when I don’t reply to comments right away. And, that reminds me, I now have photos of enough species to put me over half-way finished with the project right now. All the photos may not be great, but I have them, and can always update the posts with better photos in the future.
You know, that’s quite an accomplishment, getting photos good enough to positively identify over half of the species of birds regularly seen in Michigan in just over a year! I have my vacation coming up, I’d be shocked if I don’t add to my species total during those two weeks, and I sure am itching to go!
Tuesday
It’s late, I worked late, slept in late, and now I’m pressed for time, so this will be short.
The weather today is what had been forecast for yesterday, a wonderful day.
The weather forecast for next week, the first week of my vacation is looking very good as well, I think that the weatherman was trying to give me a heart attack by predicting snow for the middle of next week.
I have two full weeks off, so I’ll do my laundry, cooking, and packing on Saturday, and start north on Sunday. That’s something I would probably do anyway, as doing that, I avoid the weekend traffic and crowds. I still have no set plans as to where to start, but it’s looking like I’ll spend the first few nights along the upper Manistee River to do some trout fishing, and possibly go looking for Kirkland warblers.
That’s all for now, I’m going to get outside and enjoy as much of this day as I can!
Well once again, I spent too much time enjoying this fine example of a spring day, and I don’t have much time left to describe the day, other than in my photos. But, before I get to them, I have to say that I can not tell you in words just how much I love this time of year! The days are cool, the nights are nippy, and new life is appearing everywhere!
So, on to the photos, starting with a goldfinch that was alternately eating parts of the flowers he is perched near…
…and singing his fool head off.
There are many flowers in bloom.
If dandelions weren’t so hard to kill, we would probably give them the respect as a flower that they deserve.
I stood in a thorn-bush and fought the wind for these next two, I wouldn’t say that the wind won, I would call it a tie. The photos aren’t as sharp as they could be, but they were the best I could do since the flower never stopped moving.
This is the time of year when many leaves look almost as pretty as flowers as they open.
There were birds about as well.
This next one may be the son of the oriole above from last summer, as it is a first year male that doesn’t have his adult plumage yet.
Now then, a few more words about the weather forecasts. A light wind, as was forecast for today, does not cause this to happen.
A seven mile an hour wind also doesn’t cause flags to fly straight out either, but I didn’t shoot a photo of that. But, I’m sure glad that the meteorologists can’t get the forecast for the day correct, as now they are back to predicting snow up north for the end of next week. I hope that they are wrong, but I had better be prepared, as snow has happened to me before up there this time of year.
One more thing, there may be storms tomorrow morning about the time that I go for my walk, if that does happen, I’m going to do some shopping for a few items that I need for my vacation, as I haven’t gotten around to that yet.
Wednesday
The storms have already moved through the area, and the weather is improving as I type this. It also looks like I’ll have at least one full week of close to perfect for me weather for my vacation. Not too hot, not to cold, and not too much rain. I hope that the latest forecast holds true!
I’m feeling antsy because I haven’t started packing yet, but on the other hand, since I have everything for camping stored in totes and ready to go, I know that other than food, I don’t have much packing to do. It’s just a matter of throwing some clothes into a duffel bag, and then shoving everything into my Forester. I can do all that on Saturday, and be ready to hit the road bright and early on Sunday. If things go my way, I should have my camp set up on the banks of the Manistee River by early afternoon, and I can do some late afternoon fishing.
Sorry, I drifted off in a dream there for a few minutes, time for me to get moving. đŸ˜‰
I’m back, and the first thing that I have to report is that the park that I walk in during the week, myself, and the photo of the white-eyed vireo that I sent to eBird for verification are all becoming celebrities of sorts.
I bumped into another serious birder this morning, and he knew my name, and that I was the one that reported the vireo to eBirds. He told me that another birder had been at the park earlier in the morning, and had reported over 70 species of birds, so the guy I was talking to had taken an early long lunch from work to stop at the park to check it out. During the course of our conversation, I found out that the photo of mine had made the rounds among the serious birders, who knew that there were so many hardcore birders out there?
Now, I feel almost obligated to come up with another rare sighting to prove that the vireo wasn’t a fluke. đŸ˜‰
Well, it was, and it wasn’t. It’s not as if I were stalking white-eyed vireos when I saw one, but, I am always on the lookout for new species of birds, so the fact that I am one of the handful of people to have seen a white-eyed vireo in this area isn’t a total surprise, given how much time I spend chasing birds. I may not be that good at identifying them yet, but I can usually tell a new to me species when I see it. The reason that I started carrying a camera with me when I started walking for exercise is that I saw so many different species of birds.
Anyway, I didn’t see any rare birds today, just a few of the more common ones around here.
Just as yesterday, I’m going to start with a goldfinch, as I believe that it is the same one as yesterday, as it was in the same tree, but my photos are better today.
And, just like yesterday, he was alternately eating and singing.
I haven’t posted an image of a fox squirrel lately, this one is pretty good in its own way.
I shot a couple of good photos of a turkey vulture, but I think that I’ll skip those today to keep this reasonable. I’ll post one of a female red-winged blackbird instead.
I think that the focusing of the new 300 mm prime lens is getting broken in, as it seems to do a little better each day. I’m not sure that the photo above would have been as good as it is the way the lens functioned when I first got it.
I’m not sure what species of snake that this is, but it was cute.
If you look at the pavement, you can see how short the depth of field is with the new lens and extender in poor light, the focus has to be perfect.
I caught a field sparrow checking to see if I was ready to catch his singing performance, I was.
I posted a couple of photos of white-throated sparrows yesterday to show the variations in color. I have three more from today to both show that the new lens is working better, and also to show what a typical adult white-throated sparrow looks like.
Here’s a cottonwood catkin just beginning to open.
A song sparrow.
And finally, another of my favorite species of bird has returned for the summer, a grey catbird. I had to go in after him, but only the images of him on the ground were cropped at all. The photos may not be great, but, I did get the bird!
I was actually too close to get the entire catbird in the frame at first, and there were small branches between us, but my persistence paid off, now I’ll have to catch him in good light! It was good the hear him singing again. They and brown thrashers both use parts of other bird’s songs in their own songs, it they are a pleasure to listen to.
Time has slipped away from me again, that’s it for today.
Thursday
I think that every morning this week I have awoken at dawn, which is way too early for some one who doesn’t get home from work until around 1 AM, and then I’ve gone back to sleep. I’ve ended up sleeping in later than I would have liked to, so I’ve had less time for my walk and blogging. The same thing happened this morning. Waking up at dawn is great, I intend to do so everyday for the next two weeks, but it has messed up my week this week.
Today is forecast to be hot, the warmest day since the beginning of September of 2013, eight long, cold months ago. I would probably complain about the heat if we were having this type of weather every day right now, but since it will only last for today, I’ll deal with it.
I’d try some flower macro photos today, but there’s a 30 MPH wind blowing the warm air in this direction. This spring has been very windy most days, the windiest that I can remember. That goes with the roller coaster temperatures that we’ve had, one or two nice days per week, then cool to cold for the rest of the week. It takes a stiff wind to constantly change the air mass over us. The only calm days that I can remember have been on the rainy days, oh well, there’s always next spring.
The forecast for tomorrow is calling for strong to severe storms tomorrow morning, if that turns out to be true, I’ll do my shopping then, along with stopping at the bank for cash for my vacation. The Michigan DNR doesn’t accept credit or debit cards when one pays daily to camp in a State Forest campground, and it is $13 per night, so I’ll need some ones.
Well, I’m just babbling now, time for food and a walk.
I’m back, and it’s late. The park is erupting in birds and blooms, there simply wasn’t time for me to get photos of everything that I wanted to. And, with so many birds that I’m seeing for the first time this year, I had to check the identification of several that I photographed today. Some of the first of the year were easy, like the rose-breasted grosbeaks, but there others, such as black-throated green warblers and pine warblers, that I had to verify what they were. I also tried to not photograph familiar subjects, but I couldn’t stop myself, as you will see. Here’s the photos, I don’t know if I’ll have time to elaborate on them tonight after work or not.
Friday
Sorry folks, I didn’t get back to this last night, I have put getting ready for my vacation ahead of working on my blog. I say that even though this morning, I did four drafts of posts in the My Photo Life List project this morning, which are scheduled to be published while I’m on vacation.
It’s been raining this morning, with an occasional flash of lightning, and rumble of thunder, nothing serious, but enough to keep me inside so far. I don’t mind the rain, but the lightning is what keeps me in.
The rain has about ended, and I’m torn as to whether I should go for a walk to see if there are as many birds as yesterday, or if I should do my shopping today. I may be sorry tomorrow, but I’m going for a walk today.
I’m back, and the jury is still out as far as whether walking today was a good idea or not. I know that I have left myself a lot to do tomorrow, but I enjoyed my walk today, despite the weather.
It was very windy (again) as colder air is heading this way, and the dark clouds overhead spit sprinkles of rain from time to time. There weren’t as many species of birds as yesterday, but it was hard to tell since the treetops were swaying so wildly. I did see a few smaller birds up high, along with orioles, but I didn’t bother even trying to get any photos. That is, until I saw a Cooper’s hawk swoop past me to land on a fence.
I have an image of the hawk as it took flight, but it’s not very good, and also a few of the hawk going from tree to tree looking for lunch, but there’s no reason to post them.
Along the creek, I shot a couple of my favorite birds.
I didn’t crop the photo of the cardinal at all, I liked how it looked in the middle of all the new green leaves, although the leaves didn’t come out as well as I had hoped. I included the catbird because it was trying to feed on sumac drupes, but every time it landed in the sumac, the resident robin would chase the catbird away. That turned out okay, because a little later, I found a pair of catbirds in another patch of sumac.
I was fighting both the wind, which was blowing the birds and the sumac around, and the short depth of field due to the very low light and wide open aperture. But then, the second catbird perched in a nearby bush where I could get better photos.
Finally, a trillium to remind me to mention the flowers this spring.
This is only my second year walking Creekside Park, I don’t remember seeing so many early spring flowers last year. It could be that I was too fixated on birds and also that I didn’t have a lens suitable for photographing flowers last spring. It could have been the weather, we had record rains and flooding last April. Or, it could be that I was walking in the wrongs areas in the park, who knows? But, there may not be a carpet of trillium as in Aman Park, but there seems to be more species of flowers here.
That brings up something else. In a way, I’m going to miss mid-spring this year due to the timing of my vacation. I’ll be going “back in time” by going up north, two to three weeks back, if things are as they normally are.
In a normal year, spring is well on its way to early summer around here by this time, but because of the long, cold winter, spring has been late this year. There’s part of me that wants to stick closer to home, as it is just now getting to my favorite time of the year. On the other hand, I need to get away to the peace and quiet of up north, even if it won’t be as spring-like as it usually is.
That’s the reason I try to take a vacation in mid-May, so that I hit spring twice, once here, then again, up there. That’s not going to be the case this year. Oh well, there will be plenty more springs for me to photograph flowers, maybe there’ll be less wind next year. This spring has been a very windy one, and it doesn’t look as if that’s going to change soon.
Saturday
I slept like a rock last night, it’s so good to know that I have two full weeks off from work. I have a lot to do today to prepare for my excursion up north, so this will be short today.
I have some errands to run this morning, then packing this afternoon, so I don’t know if I’ll have time for a walk or not. The weather is perfect, so I hope to, but may not be able to fit it in.
So, I have a few leftover photos to throw in, then, I’m off.